Foreign affairs and diaspora
Serbian language and Cyrillic
Expropriation
Natural disasters
Security services
Youth and sport
Independent state authorities and bodies
TOTAL
9
6
5
5
4
4
4
3,276
0.27%
0.18%
0.15%
0.15%
0.12%
0.12%
0.12%
100%
Table 6 – The outcome of the cases 29 from 2019
number
%
1,333
59.86%
467
20.97%
Outcome
Inadmissible complaints
Unfounded complaints
Cases contained in the recommendations from the expedited
oversight procedure
Informed and advised complainant
Withdrawal of the complaint due to the standoff of the complainant
Cases contained in the recommendations from the oversight
procedure
Opinion
Suspension due to the death of the complainant
Statement of the Protector of Citizens
Total
238
136
30
10.69%
6.11%
1.75%
13
0.58%
8
1
1
2,227
0.36%
0.04%
0.04%
100%
The greatest number of received complaints is rejected by the Protector of Citizens because
the legally prescribed conditions for acting upon them are not fulfilled. The complaints are
rejected due to incompetence, untimeliness, prematurity, anonymity and formal deficiency.
A very important segment of acting of the Protector of Citizens upon complaints is the
provision of advisory-legal assistance which is provided by the Protector of Citizens even
when the complaint is rejected because of incompetence or prematurity. Such advisory
assistance is provided to citizens in 81.47 percent of rejected cases (1.333). In such cases the
Protector of Citizens refers the complainant to the competent body or advises them on
available legal remedies.
Table 7 – Review of inadmissible complaints in 2019
Number
627
459
164
32
31
20
1,333
Inadmissible complaints
Incompetence
Unused legal remedies
Irregular complaint
Untimeliness
Unauthorized applicant
Anonymous complaint
Total
The case refers to the cases which emerged from the actions upon complaints and upon own initiatives in
individual area/department.
29
- 21 -
Select target paragraph3
Connect to a paragraph
Connect to an entity
Disable highlights
Add to table of contents