Communication N° 120/1998
Submitted by: Sadiq Shek Elmi
Alleged victim: The author
State party: Australia
Date of adoption of Views: 14 May 1999
Subject matter: deportation of complainant to
Somalia involving risk of torture by nonState entities
continuously moved around the country for reasons
of security, travelling to places that he thought
would be safer. He avoided checkpoints and main
roads and travelled through small streams and the
bush on foot.
Procedural issue: none
Substantive issue: risk of torture after deportation
2.4 The author arrived in Australia on 2 October
1997 without valid travel documents and has been
held in detention since his arrival. On 8 October
1997, he made an application for a protection visa to
the Department of Immigration and Multicultural
Affairs. Following an interview with the author held
on 12 November 1997, the application was rejected
on 25 March 1998. On 30 March 1998, he sought
review of the negative decision before the Refugee
Review Tribunal (RRT), which turned down his
request for a review on 21 May 1998. The author
subsequently appealed to the Minister for
Immigration and Multicultural Affairs who under the
Migration Act has the personal, non-compellable and
non-reviewable power to intervene and set aside
decisions of RRT where it is in the “public interest”
to do so. This request was denied on 22 July 1998.
Article of the Convention: 3
1.
The author of the communication is Mr. Sadiq
Shek Elmi, a Somali national from the Shikal clan,
currently residing in Australia, where he has applied
for asylum and is at risk of expulsion. He alleges that
his expulsion would constitute a violation by
Australia of article 3 of the Convention against
Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading
Treatment or Punishment. He is represented by
counsel.
The facts as submitted by the author
2.1 The author was born on 10 July 1960 in
Mogadishu. Before the war he worked as a
goldsmith in Mogadishu, where his father was an
elder of the Shikal clan. The author states that
members of the Shikal clan, of Arabic descent, are
identifiable by their lighter coloured skin and
discernable accent. The clan is known for having
brought Islam to Somalia, for its religious leadership
and relative wealth. The author claims that the clan
has not been directly involved in the fighting,
however it has been targeted by other clans owing to
its wealth and its refusal to join or support
economically the Hawiye militia. In the lead up to
the ousting of President Barre in late 1990, the
author’s father, as one of the elders of his clan, was
approached by leaders of the Hawiye clan seeking
Shikal financial support and fighters for the Hawiye
militia.
2.5 On 22 October 1998, the author was informed
that he was to be returned to Mogadishu, via
Johannesburg. Amnesty International intervened in
the case and, in a letter dated 28 October 1998,
urged the Minister for Immigration and Multicultural
Affairs to use his powers not to remove the author as
planned. In addition, the same day the author
submitted a request to the Minister to lodge a second
application for a protection visa. In the absence of
the exercise of the Minister’s discretion, the lodging
of a new application for refugee status is prohibited.
2.6 On 29 October 1998, the author was taken to
Melbourne Airport to be deported, escorted by
guards from the Immigration Detention Centre.
However, the author refused to board the plane. As a
result, the captain of the aircraft refused to take him
on board. The author was then taken back to the
detention centre. On the same day he addressed an
additional plea to the Minister in support of his
previous requests not to be removed from Australia;
it was rejected. On 30 October 1998, the author was
informed that his removal would be carried out the
following day. On the same date he sought an
interim injunction from Justice Haynes at the High
Court of Australia to restrain the Minister from
continuing the removal procedure. Justice Haynes
dismissed the author’s application on 16 November
1998, in view of the fact that the circumstances did
2.2 The author further states that upon refusal to
provide support to the Hawiye militia in general, and
in particular to provide one of his sons to fight for
the militia, his father was shot and killed in front of
his shop. The author’s brother was also killed by the
militia when a bomb detonated inside his home, and
his sister was raped three times by members of the
Hawiye militia, precipitating her suicide in 1994.
2.3 The author claims that on a number of
occasions he barely escaped the same fate as his
family members, and that his life continues to be
threatened, particularly by members of the Hawiye
clan who, at present, control most of Mogadishu.
From 1991 until he left Somalia in 1997, he
70
Select target paragraph3
Connect to a paragraph
Connect to an entity
Disable highlights
Add to table of contents