CAT/C/37/D/259/2004 page 11 Notes 1 The State party cites communications No. 94/1997, K.N. v. Switzerland, decision of 19 May 1998, para. 10.5; and No. 100/1997, J.U.A. v. Switzerland, decision of 10 November 1998, paras. 6.3 and 6.5. 2 Communications No. 220/2002, Ruben David v. Sweden, decision of 2 May 2005; No. 221/2002, M.M.K. v. Sweden, decision of 3 May 2005; No. 223/2002, S.U.A. v. Sweden, decision of 22 November 2004; No. 226/2003, T.A. v. Sweden, decision of 6 May 2005; No. 243/2004, M.S.A. v. Sweden, decision of 6 May 2005. 3 Communications No. 221/2002, M.M.K. v. Sweden, decision of 3 May 2005, para. 8.6; and No. 243/2004, M.S.A. v. Sweden, decision of 6 May 2005, para. 4.2. 4 Communication No. 221/2002, M.M.K. v. Sweden, decision of 3 May 2005, para. 8.7. 5 Communication No. 106/1998, N.P. v. Australia, decision of 6 May 1999, para. 6.5. 6 Communication No. 226/2003, T.A. v. Sweden. -----

Select target paragraph3