A/HRC/7/3/Add.2 page 80 cautelares en dos casos en favor de miembros de organizaciones civiles de derechos humanos. Mongolia Follow-up to the recommendations made by the Special Rapporteur in the report of his visit to Mongolia in June 2005 (E/CN.4/2006/6/Add.4, paras. 55-56). 392. The Special Rapporteur notes that since the visit was carried out no information has been provided by the Government of Mongolia concerning efforts to implement the recommendations contained in the report. He recalls previous resolutions, which emphasise the importance of States to enter into a constructive dialogue with the Special Rapporteur with respect to the follow-up to his recommendations, and to ensure proper follow-up. The Special Rapporteur reaffirms that he stands ready to assist the Government in its efforts to prevent and combat torture and ill-treatment. 393. Recommendation (a) stated: The highest authorities, particularly those responsible for law enforcement activities, declare unambiguously that the culture of impunity must end and that torture and ill-treatment by public officials will not be tolerated and will be subject to prosecution; 394. Recommendation (b) stated: The crime of torture be defined in accordance with article 1 of the Convention, with penalties commensurate with the gravity of torture; 395. Recommendation (c) stated: Those legally arrested should not be held in facilities under the control of their interrogators or investigators for more than the time required by law to obtain a judicial warrant of pre-trial detention, which should not exceed 48 hours. After this period, they should be transferred to a pretrial facility under a different authority, where no further unsupervised contact with the interrogators or investigators should be permitted; 396. Recommendation (d) stated: Custody registers be scrupulously maintained, recording of the time and place of arrest, the identity of the police officers, the actual place of detention, the state of health of the person upon arrival at the detention centre, the time family or a lawyer was contacted and visited the detainee, and information about the compulsory medical examinations undertaken upon being brought to a detention centre and upon transfer; 397. Recommendation (e) stated: Confessions made by persons in custody without the presence of a lawyer and which are not confirmed before a judge should not be admissible as evidence against the persons who made the confession. Serious consideration should be given to video and audio taping of all persons present during proceedings in interrogation rooms;