Poročilo Varuha človekovih pravic Republike Slovenije o izvajanju nalog državnega preventivnega mehanizma za leto 2011 28 Implementation of the Duties and Powers of the National Preventive Mechanism in 2011 • Neusklajenost ure končanja pridržanja z uro izročitve osebe v postopek preiskovalnemu sodniku (PP Idrija). • The time when the detention concluded was not consistent with the time when the person was taken before the investigating judge (PP Idrija). • Netočno evidentiranje začetka in konca pridržanja (PP IU Kranj). • Inaccurate recording of the start and end of detention (PP IU Kranj). • Netočni časovni okvirji postopka s pridržano osebo (PP Bled). • Inaccurate timeframes of procedure involving the detained person (PP Bled). • S pregledom dokumentacije je bilo na več PP ugotovljeno, da so policisti izpolnili tudi rubriko o obveščanju diplomatskega predstavništva, čeprav ni šlo za tujca oziroma tujko (PP Škofja Loka, PP Gornja Radgona, PP Ruše). V teh primerih je DPM predlagal, da naj policiste opozorijo, da na obrazcih o pridržanju v prihodnje izpolnijo le rubrike, ki jih je treba izpolniti. • Inspection of documentation showed that in several PPs, police officers also completed the section on the notification of diplomatic representation, although no foreigner was involved (PP Škofja Loka, PP Gornja Radgona, PP Ruše). In such cases, the DPM suggested that police officers be taught to complete only the sections that need be completed. • Pri obveščanju svojcev je bilo iz uradnega zaznamka o pridržanju in sklepa o pridržanju razvidno le, da je bil o tem obveščen svojec, ni pa bilo razvidno, na katero tel. številko se je klicalo (PP Ruše). DPM je v tovrstnih primerih predlagal, da se ob telefonskem obveščanju svojcev zapisuje tudi podatek, na katero telefonsko številko so bili obveščeni. • As far as information for relatives is concerned, the official note on detention and detention warrant indicated only that a relative had been informed, but did not state the telephone number called (PP Ruše). In such cases, the DPM proposed that the telephone number of the notified relative also be recorded. • Pomanjkljivo evidentiranje okoliščin pridržanj. Na PP Piran je bilo v rubriki »nadzor pridržane osebe« evidentirano samo »videonadzor«, kar je po mnenju DPM pomanjkljivo. DPM je predlagal, da se v uradni zaznamek o pridržanju zapišejo tudi druge okoliščine pridržanja, kot so osebni pregled, izročitev copat, odeje, vode, prehrane in podobno (PP Izola in PP Koper). • Insufficient information in the records of detention circumstances. In PP Piran, the section ‘Surveillance of the detained person’ included only ‘video-surveillance’, which, in the DPM’s view, is insufficient. The DPM proposed the inclusion of other circumstances in the official note on detention, such as personal inspection, provision of slippers, blanket, water, food and similar (PP Izola and PP Koper). • Pokrivanje ure vročitve sklepa o pridržanju z uro začetka pridržanja, kar je po mnenju DPM nerealno (PP Izola). • The overlap of the time when the detention warrant was served with the time when the detention started, which is unrealistic, in the opinion of the DPM (PP Izola). • Netočno naveden datum izdaje odločbe o pridržanju. Pridržanje je bilo od 8. 3. do 10. 3. 2011, na odločbi o pridržanju pa je bil naveden datum izdaje odločbe 31. 12. 2010 (PP Izola). • Inaccurately stated date of issue of the detention warrant. Detention lasted from 8 March to 10 March 2011, but the date of issue stated in the detention warrant was 31 December 2010 (PP Izola). Pri pregledu dokumentacije mladoletne osebe na PPIU Kranj je iz nje izhajalo, da je bila pridržana oseba seznanjena s pravicami v albanskem jeziku. Ker iz uradnega zaznamka ni bilo mogoče ugotoviti, kdo in kako je to osebo s pravicami seznanil v albanskem jeziku (po besedah sogovornika je to razvidno iz preostale dokumentacije, kjer se hrani stroškovnik, ki se izda prevajalcu), je DPM predlagal, da se morebitna navzočnost prevajalca z imenom in priimkom ter časovnim okvirjem (prihodom in odhodom) zapiše tudi v uradnih zaznamkih o zadržanju (pridržanju) pod rubriko »druge ugotovitve in opombe«. An inspection of the documentation of a minor held in PPIU Kranj showed that the detained person was informed of their rights in Albanian. Since the official note failed to include information on who informed the person of their rights in Albanian, and how (according to the discussion partner, this is indicated in the remaining documentation where the record of expenses issued to the translator is kept), the DPM proposed that the potential presence of a translator be recorded in official notes on detention (apprehension) under the section ’Other findings and notes’. Ker je šlo v tem istem primeru za mladoletno osebo, je bilo potrebno tudi obveščanje pristojnega centra za socialno delo. DPM je ugotovil, da tudi navedeni podatek, da je bil center za socialno delo obveščen o zadržanju, iz arhivske dokumentacije ni bil razviden. DPM je tudi v takšnih primerih, predlagal, da se obveščanje centra za socialno delo dodatno zapiše tudi v uradne zaznamke o zadržanju (pridržanju) pod rubriko »druge ugotovitve in opombe«. As the person in this case was a minor, the competent social work centre should have been notified. The DPM established that the fact that the social work centre had been informed of the detention was not seen in the archives. In such cases, the DPM also suggested that the notification of the social work centre be recorded in the official notes on detention (apprehension) under the section ‘Other findings and notes’. Nadalje smo ob pregledu dokumentacije ugotovili več nepravilnosti, ko je bila pridržani osebi ponujena zdravstvena pomoč. Tako je bilo na PP Jesenice v rubriki »zdravstveno stanje pridržane osebe« zapisano samo, da so policisti pridržani osebi oskrbeli rano na nosu. Nadalje je bilo iz dokumentacije na PP Ruše ugotovljeno, da je bila oseba med policijskim postopkom odpeljana na pregled k zdravniku, vendar pa iz uradnega zaznamka ni razvidno h kateremu. DPM je predlagal, da se v prihodnje v primerih, ko je potrebna zdravstvena oskrba pridržane osebe, to zapiše v uradni zaznamek oziroma da se dosledno izpolnijo vse rubrike uradnega zaznamka. Furthermore, the inspection of documentation revealed several irregularities concerning medical attention offered to the detained person. In PP Jesenice, the section ’Health condition of the detained person’ stated only that police officers had taken care of the detained person’s nose injury. Documentation in PP Ruše further showed that the person had been taken to a doctor during the police procedure, but the official note did not indicate to which doctor. The DPM proposed that when a detained person requires medical attention in future, this is entered in the official note, or that all sections of the official note are consistently completed. Državni preventivni mehanizem v Republiki Sloveniji po Opcijskem protokolu h Konvenciji OZN proti mučenju in drugim krutim, nečloveškim ali poniževalnim kaznim ali ravnanju National Preventive Mechanism in the Republic of Slovenia under the Optional Protocol to the UN Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment 29