Poročilo Varuha človekovih pravic Republike Slovenije o izvajanju nalog državnega preventivnega mehanizma za leto 2011 Nadalje smo na PP Izola pri pregledu uradnega zaznamka ugotovili, da je imela oseba pri odreditvi pridržanja poškodbe oziroma odrgnine na desni pesti in odrgnine desnega kolena. Navedeno je bilo tudi, da ima depresijo. DPM je pogrešal podatek, da policisti, ki so odredili pridržanje, niso zapisali, ali je bila osebi, ki je bila očitno poškodovana, ponujena zdravniška pomoč. DPM je menil, da je v primerih, ko gre za vidno poškodbo, vedno treba obvestiti zdravnika oziroma peljati pridržano osebo na pregled in oskrbo poškodb k zdravniku. DPM je o vseh nedoslednostih, nepravilnostih in netočnostih obvestil Ministrstvo za notranje zadeve in dal priporočilo, da se v prihodnje točneje in dosledneje evidentirajo vsi podatki v dokumentaciji in da na to dodatno opozori vse policiste. Na nekaterih PP smo opazili primere dobre prakse, in sicer: • Dosledno izpolnjevanje rubrik uradnega zaznamka o pridržanju na PP Škofja Loka, v delu »nadzor pridržane osebe in ugotovitve« ter »druge ugotovitve in pripombe«, saj je iz njih mogoče razbrati vse dejavnosti policistov glede pridržane osebe (ponujena hrana, voda, nadzor …). • Za privedene osebe na PP Tolmin vodijo posebno ročno evidenco privedenih in vabljenih oseb na PP. Za vsako privedbo se izdela posebna mapa, v kateri je shranjena vsa dokumentacija, ki se nanaša na konkreten primer. Furthermore, inspection of an official note in PP Izola showed that the person had injuries or abrasions on the right fist and abrasions on the right knee at the time the detention had been ordered. It was also stated that the person suffered from depression. The DPM could not locate the information that should have been recorded by police officers as to whether the person, who was obviously injured, had been offered medical assistance. The DPM stated that, in cases of obvious injury, a doctor must be notified, or the detained person taken to a doctor for examination and treatment of injuries. The DPM notified the Ministry of the Interior of all inconsistencies, irregularities and inaccuracies, and recommended that all information in the documentation be recorded more accurately and consistently in future and that police officers be additionally cautioned thereof. Good practice examples were observed in some PPs: • Consistently completing all sections of the official note on detention in PP Škofja Loka, in the sections ‘Surveillance of detained person and findings’ and ‘Other findings and notes’, as they indicate all the activities of police officers concerning the detained person (food and water offered, surveillance etc.) • At PP Tolmin, they keep hard-copy records of persons apprehended and persons invited to the PP. A file is prepared for each apprehension containing all documentation related to the case. Pritožbene poti Complaints procedures Policijske postaje imajo različno urejene pritožbene poti. Skoraj vse PP imajo knjigo pohval in pritožb (razen PP Kranj), ki je pri dežurnem policistu. Večina PP (razen PP Idrija, Jesenice, Kranj, Izola, Tolmin, Koper, Lenart) pa ima tudi nabiralnike, kar daje možnost pridržanimi osebam anonimno podajo pritožbe/pohvale, prav tako lahko to izkoristijo tujci, ki sicer niso seznanjeni s slovenskimi predpisi o možnosti pritožb zoper delo uradnih oseb (ob predpostavki, da je nabiralnik tudi ustrezno označen v tujem jeziku). PP Škofja Loka prav tako nima nabiralnika, vendar so po pojasnilu sogovornika v postopku pridobitve nabiralnika. PP Ilirska Bistrica sicer nabiralnik ima, vendar na njem ni bil označen namen. DPM je predlagal, da se na nabiralnik namesti ustrezen napis. The complaints procedures of police stations (PPs) vary. Almost all PPs keep a comments and complaints book (except PP Kranj) stored with the duty officer. Most PPs (except PP Idrija, Jesenice, Kranj, Izola, Tolmin, Koper, Lenart) also have boxes in which detained persons can file a comment/complaint anonymously; they may also be used by foreigners who do not know the Slovenian regulations on making complaints about the behaviour of public officials (assuming the collection box is appropriately labelled in other languages). PP Škofja Loka does not have a complaints box, but according to the discussion partner’s explanation, they are in the process of obtaining one. PP Ilirska Bistrica has a box, but there was no label indicating its purpose. The DPM proposed that an appropriate label be put on the box. Dostop do PP invalidom in parkirni prostori za stranke, tudi invalidne osebe Access to PPs for the disabled, and parking for clients, including the disabled Razen na treh (Idrija, Grosuplje in Ruše) imajo vse druge PP ustrezen in urejen dostop za invalide. Na teh treh PP je dostop do dežurnega policista mogoč le po več stopnicah. Pred stopnicami ni niti zvonca, s katerim bi invalidni obiskovalec lahko poklical dežurnega policista. Dostop invalidne stranke je tako odvisen od tega, ali jo dežurni policist opazi na kameri ali če v PP po naključju pride še kakšna druga stranka in dežurnega policista obvesti o prihodu invalidne osebe. V vseh primerih mora dežurni policist zapustiti svoje delovno mesto, da se lahko pogovori z njo. DPM kot pozitivno ocenjuje urejen dostop za invalide in rezervirani dve parkirni mesti za invalide (PP Ptuj). Except in three PPs (Idrija, Grosuplje and Ruše), all PPs have suitable and arranged access for the disabled. At these three PPs, there are several steps to cross to access the duty officer. There is no bell in front of the steps for disabled visitors to call the duty officer. Access for disabled clients thus depends on whether the duty officer sees the person on the CCTV camera, or if another client incidentally comes to the PP and notifies the duty officer that a disabled person is at the PP. In each case, the duty officer must leave his or her workplace to deal with the disabled person. Arranged access for the disabled and two parking spaces reserved for the disabled (PP Ptuj) is considered positive by the DPM. Delovne razmere za zaposlene DPM je ugotovil, da policisti opravljajo delo v slabih delovnih razmerah na dveh PP (Izola in Jesenice), kjer jim niso zagotovljeni ustrezni garderobni prostori, na PP Jesenice pa policisti in policistke tudi nimajo ločenih garderobnih prostorov ter možnosti prhanja. Na PP Jesenice so garderobni prostori v garaži, ki je bila sicer za ta namen pregrajena, na PP Izola pa so majhne garderobne omare kar v sobi za policiste. V isti sobi se opravijo tudi pogovori s strankami, kajti PP nima posebne sobe za sprejem strank. DPM je ugotovil, da sta PP Izola in PP Jesenice med redkimi, ki nimata ustreznih delovnih razmer za policiste, in zato predlagal, da se na navedenih PP proučijo možnosti za čimprejšnje izboljšanje delovnih razmer. 30 Implementation of the Duties and Powers of the National Preventive Mechanism in 2011 Državni preventivni mehanizem v Republiki Sloveniji po Opcijskem protokolu h Konvenciji OZN proti mučenju in drugim krutim, nečloveškim ali poniževalnim kaznim ali ravnanju Working conditions for employees The DPM established that police officers work in poor working conditions in two PPs (Izola and Jesenice), where police officers do not have suitable changing room, and in PP Jesenice, where female and male police officers do not have separate changing rooms and showers. In PP Jesenice, the changing room is situated in the garage, which is divided by a wall for this purpose; in PP Izola, there are small lockers in the room for police officers. The same room is used for interviews with clients, since there is no separate room for this purpose in the PP. The DPM established that PP Izola and PP Jesenice are among the rare PPs which do not provide suitable working conditions for police officers, and therefore suggested that possibilities for prompt improvements to working conditions in them be considered. National Preventive Mechanism in the Republic of Slovenia under the Optional Protocol to the UN Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment 31