1.11 Priloga: Metodologija izvajanja nalog državnega preventivnega mehanizma v Republiki Sloveniji
Temelji delovanja DPM v Republiki Sloveniji
Bases for the functioning of the NPM in the Republic of Slovenia
DPM v Republiki Sloveniji redno preverja ravnanje z osebami, ki jim je bila odvzeta prostost (osebe),
da bi se okrepilo njihovo varstvo pred mučenjem in drugimi oblikami okrutnega, nečloveškega ali
poniževalnega ravnanja ali kaznovanja. Ob upoštevanju ustreznih pravnih norm DPM ustreznim organom
daje priporočila, da bi izboljšali razmere in ravnanje z osebami ter preprečili mučenje in druge oblike
okrutnega, nečloveškega, poniževalnega ravnanja ali kaznovanja. V zvezi s tem lahko predložijo tudi
predlogi in pripombe k veljavnim ali predlaganim zakonom.
The NPM in the Republic of Slovenia regularly verifies the treatment of persons deprived of their liberty
in order to strengthen their protection from torture and other forms of cruel, inhuman or degrading
treatment or punishment. While observing suitable legal norms, the NPM makes recommendations to
relevant authorities to improve the conditions and treatment of people and prevent torture and other
forms of cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment. In this regard, it may also submit
proposals and comments on applicable or drafted acts.
DPM redno obiskuje vse kraje odvzema prostosti v Republiki Sloveniji in tako sistematično in kontinuirano
zbira ter obravnava relevantne informacije, ki se nanašajo na kraje odvzema prostosti. Na tej podlagi
nato o svojih ugotovitvah poroča pristojnim organom in širši javnosti, po potrebi pa ukrepa tudi še
drugače, skladno z možnostmi, ki jih ima na podlagi OPCAT oziroma MOPPM. Varuh v zvezi z DPM po
potrebi ukrepa tudi skladno z ZVarCP.
The NPM regularly visits all places of deprivation of liberty in Slovenia and thus systematically and
continuously collects and discusses relevant information referring to places of deprivation of liberty.
On this basis, it reports its findings to the competent authorities and general broader public and takes
other measures if necessary in accordance with the possibilities provided by the OPCAT or the MOPPM.
In relation to the NPM, the Ombudsman also takes action according to the ZVarCP.
Znani kraji odvzema prostosti v Republiki Sloveniji so zlasti:
- zavodi za prestajanje kazni zapora z vsemi njihovimi oddelki in Prevzgojni dom Radeče,
- vzgojno-izobraževalni zavodi,
- socialnovarstveni in posebni socialnovarstveni zavodi,
- psihiatrične bolnišnice,
- prostori za policijsko pridržanje oziroma zadržanje,
- Center za tujce in Azilni dom,
- prostori za pridržanje v Slovenski vojski in
- vsi drugi kraji v smislu 4. člena Opcijskega protokola (npr. policijska intervencijska vozila ipd.).
Official places of deprivation of liberty in the Republic of Slovenia include in particular:
-p
risons and all their units and Radeče Juvenile Correctional Facility,
- educational institutions,
- social care and special social care institutions,
- psychiatric hospitals,
- police detention rooms,
- the Aliens Centre and the Asylum Centre,
-d
etention rooms operated by the Slovenian Armed Forces,
-a
ll other locations as per Article 4 of the Optional Protocol (for example, police intervention vehicles,
etc.).
DPM torej preverja predvsem ravnanje s priporniki, obsojenci na prestajanju kazni zapora in
mladoletniškega zapora, mladoletniki na prestajanju vzgojnega ukrepa oddaje v prevzgojni dom in
osebami, zoper katere se izvršuje uklonilni zapor, z otroki in mladostniki s čustvenimi in vedenjskimi
motnjami v vzgojno-izobraževalnih zavodih, osebami v varovanih in drugih oddelkih socialnovarstvenih
in posebnih socialnovarstvenih zavodov, kjer so osebe, ki jim je odvzeta prostost (če kraja ne morejo
zapustiti po svoji volji), z osebami v oddelkih pod posebnim nadzorom psihiatričnih bolnišnic, s tistimi,
ki jih pridrži oziroma zadrži policija, s tujci in prosilci za mednarodno zaščito, ki jim je odvzeta prostost,
ter z vojaškimi osebami, ki jih pridrži vojaška policija Slovenske vojske.
O tem, ali gre za kraj odvzema prostosti, v vsakem posameznem primeru presodi DPM. Seznam krajev
odvzema prostosti, ki ga od pristojnega organa pridobi DPM, slednjega ne zavezuje pri izbiri krajev, ki
jih želi preveriti skladno s svojimi pooblastili. Če se za kraj, ki ga želi DPM preveriti, trdi, da ne gre za
kraj odvzema prostosti, se DPM glede na okoliščine primera lahko sklicuje na to, da gre za kraj, kjer
bi take osebe lahko bile in da mora biti zato na podlagi 4. člena OPCAT, v povezavi z njegovim 19. in
20. členom, DPM omogočeno, da preveri ravnanje s tam nastanjenimi osebami. Enako velja tudi za
posamezne oddelke oziroma enote krajev odvzema prostosti, za katere se trdi, da jih tam nastanjene
oziroma nameščene osebe lahko zapuščajo po svoji volji.
DPM informacije o krajih odvzema prostosti pridobiva na različne načine, predvsem z rednimi, izrednimi
in kontrolnimi obiski teh krajev, s seznanjanjem z morebitnimi objavami drugih organov oziroma
organizacij in medijev o teh krajih ali problematiki, ki zadeva področje, na katerem delujejo, z vsebinami
uradnih spletnih strani teh krajev oziroma njihovimi drugimi objavami, z delavci Varuha in pobudami za
začetek postopka pri Varuhu, če pri njihovi obravnavi naletijo na informacije, ki bi se lahko uporabile tudi
pri izvajanju nalog in pooblastil DPM.
Namen pridobivanja informacij za potrebe DPM je čim bolj zanesljivo ugotavljanje okoliščin v krajih
odvzema prostosti, odkrivanje morebitnih pomanjkljivosti in podajanje priporočil za njihovo odpravo
ter za izboljšanje razmer in ravnanje z osebami, končno pa tudi za preverjanje izvedbe teh priporočil in
primerjanje razmer v različnih krajih odvzema prostosti.
166
1.11 Annex: Methodology of the implementation of the tasks of the National Preventive Mechanism (NPM) in Slovenia
poročilo o izvajanju nalog DPM v letu 2014
DržavnI preventivnI mehanizEm po Opcijskem protokolu h Konvenciji OZN proti mučenju in drugim krutim, nečloveškim ali poniževalnim kaznim ali ravnanju
The NPM thus particularly examines the treatment of detainees, prisoners in prisons and juvenile
facilities, minors in correctional facilities and persons imprisoned for the non-payment of fines, children
and adolescents with emotional and behavioural disorders in educational institutions, persons in
secure and other wards of social care and special social care institutions that accommodate people
deprived of their liberty (if not permitted to leave the facility of their own accord), persons in wards
under special supervision in psychiatric hospitals, persons detained by the police, aliens and applicants
for international protection who have been deprived of their liberty and military persons detained by the
military police of the Slovenian Armed Forces.
The NPM determines a place of deprivation of liberty in each individual case. The list of places of
deprivation of liberty obtained by the NPM from the relevant authority does not bind the NPM in the
selection of facilities it wishes to examine in accordance with its powers. If a place which the NPM wishes
to examine is not considered a place of deprivation of liberty, the NPM may as per the circumstances
of the case claim that it is a place where such persons may be accommodated and should therefore,
on the basis of Article 4 of the OPCAT and in connection with Articles 19 and 20, be enabled to examine
the treatment of people thus accommodated. The same applies to individual departments or units of
places of deprivation of liberty regarding which it is claimed that persons accommodated there are free
to leave.
The NPM obtains information about places of deprivation of liberty in different ways, particularly
by regular, extraordinary and control visits of these places, possible publications of other bodies or
organisations and media about such places or issues relating to this field, contents of official websites
of such places or their other publications, the Ombudsman’s staff and complaint procedures at the
Ombudsman if information is gathered during their discussion which may be used to implement the
duties and powers of the NPM.
The purpose of obtaining information is to establish circumstances at places of deprivation of liberty
as accurately as possible, to reveal possible deficiencies and to provide recommendations for their
elimination and improvement of conditions and the treatment of people, and also to examine the
implementation of these recommendations and compare conditions in different places of deprivation
of liberty.
IMPLEMENTATION OF THE DUTIES AND POWERS OF THE NPM IN 2014
National Preventive Mechanism under the Optional Protocol to the UN Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment
167
Select target paragraph3
Connect to a paragraph
Connect to an entity
Disable highlights
Add to table of contents